Talk:Diamond - Revision history

Ethereal at 07:40, 16 March 2015

2015-03-16T07:40:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:40, 16 March 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:: In which case we need a new description to replace that, unless of course you think we should just have the official description? [[User:Ethereal\|Ethereal]] 18:05, 15 March 2015 (MDT)		:: In which case we need a new description to replace that, unless of course you think we should just have the official description? [[User:Ethereal\|Ethereal]] 18:05, 15 March 2015 (MDT)
	::: I just edited it to what I think it should be. It is the first award in the list, which I think is where the most 'prestigious' came in. Though I don't think the awards are in order from most important to least important. [[User:Tutelary\|Tutelary]] ([[User talk:Tutelary\|talk]]) 18:12, 15 March 2015 (MDT)		::: I just edited it to what I think it should be. It is the first award in the list, which I think is where the most 'prestigious' came in. Though I don't think the awards are in order from most important to least important. [[User:Tutelary\|Tutelary]] ([[User talk:Tutelary\|talk]]) 18:12, 15 March 2015 (MDT)

			:::: Change was more or less fine, thank you. I don't think it being the first on the list was the reason, actually. [[User:Ethereal\|Ethereal]] 01:40, 16 March 2015 (MDT)

Tutelary: c

2015-03-16T00:12:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:12, 16 March 2015
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:: In which case we need a new description to replace that, unless of course you think we should just have the official description? [[User:Ethereal\|Ethereal]] 18:05, 15 March 2015 (MDT)		:: In which case we need a new description to replace that, unless of course you think we should just have the official description? [[User:Ethereal\|Ethereal]] 18:05, 15 March 2015 (MDT)
			::: I just edited it to what I think it should be. It is the first award in the list, which I think is where the most 'prestigious' came in. Though I don't think the awards are in order from most important to least important. [[User:Tutelary\|Tutelary]] ([[User talk:Tutelary\|talk]]) 18:12, 15 March 2015 (MDT)

Ethereal at 00:05, 16 March 2015

2015-03-16T00:05:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:05, 16 March 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I've softened the wording slightly. Thoughts? [[User:Ethereal\|Ethereal]] 17:52, 15 March 2015 (MDT)		I've softened the wording slightly. Thoughts? [[User:Ethereal\|Ethereal]] 17:52, 15 March 2015 (MDT)

	: What I mean to criticize if only to make sense of whether to pass judgement on an award. [http://www.hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=4731466 The Wiki guidelines] says to 'Please write objectively.' and 'Please only post factual information.'. How can we tell that this is factual? Who's arguing it? How is it the most prestigious? I would just remove the bit altogether. [[User:Tutelary\|Tutelary]] ([[User talk:Tutelary\|talk]]) 18:01, 15 March 2015 (MDT)		: What I mean to criticize if only to make sense of whether to pass judgement on an award. [http://www.hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=4731466 The Wiki guidelines] says to 'Please write objectively.' and 'Please only post factual information.'. How can we tell that this is factual? Who's arguing it? How is it the most prestigious? I would just remove the bit altogether. [[User:Tutelary\|Tutelary]] ([[User talk:Tutelary\|talk]]) 18:01, 15 March 2015 (MDT)

			:: In which case we need a new description to replace that, unless of course you think we should just have the official description? [[User:Ethereal\|Ethereal]] 18:05, 15 March 2015 (MDT)

Tutelary: /* How are we sure it's the most prestiguous? */ c

2015-03-16T00:01:29Z

How are we sure it's the most prestiguous?: c

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:01, 16 March 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I've softened the wording slightly. Thoughts? [[User:Ethereal\|Ethereal]] 17:52, 15 March 2015 (MDT)		I've softened the wording slightly. Thoughts? [[User:Ethereal\|Ethereal]] 17:52, 15 March 2015 (MDT)
			: What I mean to criticize if only to make sense of whether to pass judgement on an award. [http://www.hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=4731466 The Wiki guidelines] says to 'Please write objectively.' and 'Please only post factual information.'. How can we tell that this is factual? Who's arguing it? How is it the most prestigious? I would just remove the bit altogether. [[User:Tutelary\|Tutelary]] ([[User talk:Tutelary\|talk]]) 18:01, 15 March 2015 (MDT)

Ethereal at 23:52, 15 March 2015

2015-03-15T23:52:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:52, 15 March 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:

	The award itself doesn't state that, it merely states, 'A valued member of our community.'. It doesn't really pass much judgement. Couldn't 'Hustler' arguably be the most prestiguous or even 'Star'. It just seems arbitrary. [[User:Tutelary\|Tutelary]] ([[User talk:Tutelary\|talk]]) 17:28, 15 March 2015 (MDT)		The award itself doesn't state that, it merely states, 'A valued member of our community.'. It doesn't really pass much judgement. Couldn't 'Hustler' arguably be the most prestiguous or even 'Star'. It just seems arbitrary. [[User:Tutelary\|Tutelary]] ([[User talk:Tutelary\|talk]]) 17:28, 15 March 2015 (MDT)

			I've softened the wording slightly. Thoughts? [[User:Ethereal\|Ethereal]] 17:52, 15 March 2015 (MDT)

Tutelary: /* How are we sure it's the most prestiguous? */ new section

2015-03-15T23:28:31Z

How are we sure it's the most prestiguous?: new section

New page

== How are we sure it's the most prestiguous? ==

The award itself doesn't state that, it merely states, 'A valued member of our community.'. It doesn't really pass much judgement. Couldn't 'Hustler' arguably be the most prestiguous or even 'Star'. It just seems arbitrary. [[User:Tutelary|Tutelary]] ([[User talk:Tutelary|talk]]) 17:28, 15 March 2015 (MDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:40, 16 March 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:: In which case we need a new description to replace that, unless of course you think we should just have the official description? [[User:Ethereal\|Ethereal]] 18:05, 15 March 2015 (MDT)		:: In which case we need a new description to replace that, unless of course you think we should just have the official description? [[User:Ethereal\|Ethereal]] 18:05, 15 March 2015 (MDT)
	::: I just edited it to what I think it should be. It is the first award in the list, which I think is where the most 'prestigious' came in. Though I don't think the awards are in order from most important to least important. [[User:Tutelary\|Tutelary]] ([[User talk:Tutelary\|talk]]) 18:12, 15 March 2015 (MDT)		::: I just edited it to what I think it should be. It is the first award in the list, which I think is where the most 'prestigious' came in. Though I don't think the awards are in order from most important to least important. [[User:Tutelary\|Tutelary]] ([[User talk:Tutelary\|talk]]) 18:12, 15 March 2015 (MDT)

			:::: Change was more or less fine, thank you. I don't think it being the first on the list was the reason, actually. [[User:Ethereal\|Ethereal]] 01:40, 16 March 2015 (MDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:05, 16 March 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I've softened the wording slightly. Thoughts? [[User:Ethereal\|Ethereal]] 17:52, 15 March 2015 (MDT)		I've softened the wording slightly. Thoughts? [[User:Ethereal\|Ethereal]] 17:52, 15 March 2015 (MDT)

	: What I mean to criticize if only to make sense of whether to pass judgement on an award. [http://www.hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=4731466 The Wiki guidelines] says to 'Please write objectively.' and 'Please only post factual information.'. How can we tell that this is factual? Who's arguing it? How is it the most prestigious? I would just remove the bit altogether. [[User:Tutelary\|Tutelary]] ([[User talk:Tutelary\|talk]]) 18:01, 15 March 2015 (MDT)		: What I mean to criticize if only to make sense of whether to pass judgement on an award. [http://www.hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=4731466 The Wiki guidelines] says to 'Please write objectively.' and 'Please only post factual information.'. How can we tell that this is factual? Who's arguing it? How is it the most prestigious? I would just remove the bit altogether. [[User:Tutelary\|Tutelary]] ([[User talk:Tutelary\|talk]]) 18:01, 15 March 2015 (MDT)

			:: In which case we need a new description to replace that, unless of course you think we should just have the official description? [[User:Ethereal\|Ethereal]] 18:05, 15 March 2015 (MDT)